My reflection of the crypto meltdown.

History has shown repeatedly the apparent weaknesses that exist with centralization or the trust-based model that Satoshi has warned us about.

Under the “trust-based” model, the integrity of an institution is a function of those in control. Rules enforced from the top are guaranteed if those in power are trustworthy.

Since institutional decision making is typically opaque and unpredictable. **Rule changes are at the discretion of those in control**. Sometimes creating misalignment of incentives between the institution and its participants. To add on, institutions may implement suboptimal decisions because of human error/biases.

Due to the capitalist nature of pleasing shareholders and the asymmetric rewards and the limited liability borne by institutions, banks have moved to taking on riskier lending for short-term profit at the expense of retail investors. This is apparent in the 2008 global financial crisis, where many banks got bailed out by the US government. Wall Street walked away with hefty bonuses while main-street bear the brunt – which led to the term **“Privatizing Profits and Socializing Losses”.**

More recently with the CeFi crypto blow up where Crypto Institutions took on too much risk with retail deposits by providing credit to other high-risk taking institutions – 3AC – or generating high yields with unstainable DeFi protocols. Without effective risk management, retail depositors are at the mercy of these institutions. As of today, retail depositors cannot withdraw their funds and, in the event of insolvency, institutions are not liable to repay them.

Both events have something in common where retail depositors give up custody of their assets to a “trusted” institution. This means financial institutions get to own and control them, giving them the authority to create credit in the system and control the flow of capital. While all the profits made from credit creation go to them.

I think we should do better, because web 3 has given us the opportunity of self sovereignty. We should stop giving institutions our keys that allow them to do whatever they like. It is time we take ownership of our assets and be accountable for them.

What if there was a concept of decentralized credit in the economy? Instead of “institutions owning and controlling them”, credit creation is democratized, giving everyday people in the economy ownership to manage responsibly where they can borrow against it or monetize.

Think of it as a self sovereign financial system to complement decentralized money – Bitcoin.

View Source

6 thoughts on “My reflection of the crypto meltdown.”

  1. I was going to say, wasn’t this the whole point of crypto in the beginning? This was why Bitcoin was created?

    Be your own bank, control your own money, don’t be at the mercy of anyone else.

    In crypto world, it’s not that you “lose” control, it’s that you give it up. So don’t give it up. As always, Not your keys, not your coins.

    Reply
  2. I believe in DeFi and decentralized commerce but we can’t forget about the Terra Luna meltdown was caused by design flaws with a decentralized stablecoin

    Reply
  3. I think there is a lot of could have and should have in this thread.

    In any “game” or “free market” where there are free agents willing to act as brokers, buyers and sellers of assets, were will be consolidation of market power that is only mitigated by the system’s design.

    I have yet to see a system that prevents someone from taking more than 10% market share…

    Also even if the above happens, decentralization doesn’t remove risk; if anything in some circumstances it could increase it (think Luna).

    Reply
  4. borrowing pools and collateralized loan contracts already exist in defi. If you’re talking about actual uncollateralized credit, how are you going to solve reputation and enforcement? Centralized creditors can ask me for my personal information, income information, and run a credit check on me before giving me a loan. And because they have this they might have recourse within the law if I default. How is this going to work decentralized?

    Reply
  5. There is nothing particularly TradFi or DeFi about money creation through credit. Moneyness of a claim isn’t as black and white anymore as it may have looked in a regulated banking world.

    Treasuries have become as good as a bank deposit in terms of money to large investors. Volatile crypto isn’t as desired as stablecoins as ‘money’. Money is whatever you can trust to hold immediate value throughout a complete boom and bust cycle.

    So whether or not you hold on to your ‘base’ money isn’t what makes the difference. Transparency of the leverage in the system is what will determine the health of your money in an inevitable ‘deleveraging’ event, aka a crash. That’s where DeFi can make the difference.

    Reply
  6. I think part of the problem stems from the innate complexity of crypto. And if we have projects like Xpress giving the semblance of ease of use, we might begin to make real progress. This way, we would not yield control back to the so-called ‘experts’

    Reply

Leave a Comment